- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2013 12:01:34 -0400
- To: public-webid@w3.org
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 16:01:57 UTC
On 4/1/13 11:56 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> >> Though I think we have consensus slightly in favour rdfs : Resource > > It is clear that there is no consensus at present. I still don't have > a clear use case for why you want what > you want. > > Henry There is consensus about the need for a relation that associates an rdfs:Resource (or owl:Thing) with a public key. What's clearly in dispute is the appropriate relation :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 16:01:57 UTC