- From: Ben Laurie <benl@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:06:18 +0100
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>
On 26 September 2012 12:54, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 9/26/12 4:42 AM, Ben Laurie wrote: >> >> You realise that I'm not a big fan of ACLs, right? IMO, object >> capabilities are the better way to go. WebIDs could probably also do >> those, but then you'd be in the business of managing a very large >> number of them. > > > Do you have a pointer to a document that sheds light on "object > capabilities" ? Hopefully, I might be able to triangulate back to WebID > etc.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-capability_model gives an overview. My own paper: http://www.links.org/files/capabilities.pdf E, a language designed from the ground up to be capability friendly: http://erights.org/index.html Capabilities in FreeBSD: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/security/capsicum/ > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 September 2012 12:06:46 UTC