- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:05:05 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: public-rww@w3.org, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Kingsley Idehen wrote: > On 10/31/12 12:39 PM, Nathan wrote: >> For reference, would you be 0/1 with: >> >> a) definition WebID: an HTTP URI which denotes an Agent. Where you can >> GET an RDF model as TURTLE. > > 0. > >> b) subjectAltName ... MUST be an HTTP URI ... > > 0. any input from the other 16 people who +1'd the definition using "a hash HTTP URI"? My position can be summarised as http-uri where you can GET turtle, preference to hash URIs. This says nothing as to whether I like the constraints, but I do think they're needed to prevent webid protocol verification agents needing to support a plethora of standards and non standards, on both the protocol and mediatype sides. Kingsley, as always I really appreciate your dedication to keeping things as open and inclusive as possible on the web. Best, Nathan
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 17:06:18 UTC