W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > November 2012

Re: hash/303, all use cases, requirements, thoughts, notes, approaches, use cases, user stories..

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:33:48 +0000
Message-ID: <50AD107C.50307@webr3.org>
To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
CC: Alexandre Bertails <bertails@w3.org>, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
Henry Story wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2012, at 18:25, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>> Henry Story wrote:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash
>> I'm unsure that anything could be captured here which hasn't already been captured by the exhaustive work of Jonathan Rees and others via www-tag and the awwsw tf, see:
>>  http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/products/defininguris.html
> We can define WebIDs to be whatever we want I think. We had Tim Berners Lee argue
> strongly in favor of hash urls. So I think it cannot be that this is as clear
> as you think.
> Please add your point to the wiki hash page.

I'd be happy to condense all view points from defininguris.html and 
related pages, gathered via the tag and awwsw tf with outreach to most 
people with any view point on this long running debate, in to a single 
document - if it helps.

This includes TimBLs arguments as we spent a lot of time working with 
them and discussing them within the awwsw tf. I may be in a position to 
create a document clearly capturing all view points, positives and 
negatives, which can be read by everyone here who cares, ahead of a 
proper vote at a telecon.

Let me know if this is okay, and I'll have it done in the next 1-2 days, 
ready for review by the group(s).


Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 17:35:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:46 UTC