On 21 Nov 2012, at 17:32, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> On 11/21/12 11:08 AM, Henry Story wrote:
>> Sorry I mistyped
>>
>> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP(s) hash uri
>> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP(s) hash uri
>> [3] a WebID MUST be an HTTP(s) uri
>
> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP(s) hash uri
> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP(s) hash uri
> [3] a WebID MUST be an HTTP(s) uri
> [4] a WebID SHOULD be a an HTTP(s) uri .
I have the following up here:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash
It was my feeling that 4 would allow for non-http URIs
and that this is not part of this debate, that having
been settled last week, and at TPAC I think pretty consistently.
So for the moment I think one has to fill in the arguments.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen
> Founder & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
> Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
> LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/