- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:09:36 +0100
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Cc: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhKivwLVxkFzaCRJxYRJW-xaSjM9=r49ZXQ5CYK60kun=w@mail.gmail.com>
On 21 November 2012 17:04, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > I am not sure the RWW mailing list is the right place to send this message, > as they have not followed the debate. I think we need a wiki page that > lists > the pros and cons of each of the issues below, if you are going to bring > new > people to the conversation. > I think it's fine for a straw poll, for those that are interested. I dont see any of the mailing list protocols being violated, imho. Personally I'm a +0 and will get behind the consensus view whatever the terms are called. I liked it when it was tied FOAF+SSL, I liked it when it was tied to a public key, and I like it even better with the current split between auth and identity. All other things being equal, I lean towards the axiom of tolerance to allow as much as possible. > > On 21 Nov 2012, at 16:49, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > > > All, > > > > As per a variety of threads re. the matter of the definition of a WebID, > I kindly request a simple +1, -1, or 0 vote on the following issue of > concern: > > > > Should a WebID be defined specifically as a hash based HTTP URI? > > "Specifically" is not clear. > > In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc. > > So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms. > > [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri > [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri > [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri > > in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as > described in the current spec. > > Is this better? > > > > > > Note: > > Most of use are extremely time challenged, and really need to make > decisions and set priorities re. this matter. Thus, I would like those with > a vested interest in this matter to vote. > > > > This is an informative endeavor. > > > > Poll Question: > > Do you support defining a WebID *specifically* as a hash based HTTP URI? > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > > > Kingsley Idehen > > Founder & CEO > > OpenLink Software > > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > > > > > > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:10:05 UTC