- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 11:30:31 -0500
- To: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- CC: "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:31:01 UTC
On 11/21/12 11:04 AM, Henry Story wrote: > "Specifically" is not clear. > > In terms of language we can use MUST, SHOULD etc. > > So perhaps you can rephrase it in those terms. > > [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri > [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri > [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP hash uri > > in all cases of course we agree that the URI MUST refer to an agent as described in the current spec. > > Is this better? I missed this part in my earlier response. That's fine re. straw poll vote (via email or use of Wiki doc), but corrected to read: [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP hash uri [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP hash uri [3] a WebID SHOULD be any HTTP uri [4] a WebID MUST be an HTTP uri . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:31:01 UTC