- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:43:58 -0500
- To: public-webid@w3.org
- Message-ID: <50ABEB8E.1080509@openlinksw.com>
On 11/20/12 2:36 PM, Henry Story wrote: > The graphic showing the picture of TimBL should I think belong to an > overview section ( replacing the current section 3 ) that would explain: > > 1. The full uri denotes the agent TimBl > 2. that the uri minus the hash denotes the document > 3. that the document SHOULD describe the agent in a uniquely identifiable way, so that the > agent can be distinguished from every other agent via this definition. > ( so here one can specify that this is very general: a public key, a link to the profile document, > a link to an e-mail address, any or more will do ) > ( the reason is that otherwise one would need a backchannel to know what the WebID refers to ) > > for 1 and 2 refer to the URI rfc spec on fragment identifiers. > > --- > > I think it may be useful also to explain how these WebIDs can then be used to > create social networks - across servers. ( I can send a graphic of interlinked WebIDs for > that ). > > --- > > It may also be useful to show how one can have a WebID profile link to protected > profile document. ( an adapted version of the WebID-TLS spec graphics ), as otherwise > people will cry out that this creates anonymity problems. > > > > > Henry > > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Yes. +1 . -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2012 20:44:20 UTC