- From: Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:23:10 -0500
- To: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79eitPnRQp4PAJqU7OjfTgLpLLZP235HM9qKXvbSdfPfG-w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On 19 November 2012 21:36, Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>wrote: >> >>> * On Nov 19, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Henry Story wrote: >>> > >>> > For this you need to put up an issue in the issue tracker >>> > >>> > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/ >>> > >>> > in the product WebID-definition. Point to this e-mail for details. >>> >>> ISSUE-69 exists for this purpose. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/issues/69 >>> >>> The name/description was short-handed to get it into place before >>> being forgotten. To my eyes, your (Henry's) "additional notes" in >>> that issue reflect less of what actually happened in the telecon, >>> and more of what your interpretation of the conversation was. >>> >>> There are strong arguments for both hashed and hashless URIs. >>> I see this these arguments as reason to permit both, and to >>> include some discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of each >>> in the documents we produce -- including both the costs of lookup >>> on 3xx redirection (both client- and server-side) and the increased >>> flexibility that may be provided by such explicit indirection, vs >>> the lower cost of lookup without 3xx redirection and the limited >>> flexibility mandated by this implicit indirection. >>> >> >> I've been wondering for some time now what you gain from the 303 dance. >> >> Sorry if I've missed something, but could you go over the benefits of >> having, say >> >> http://graph.facebook.com/dave >> >> over >> >> http://graph.facebook.com/dave# >> > > > Have you checked the Facebook paper from Jesse Weaver and Paul Tarjan at > http://semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj282_0.pdf ? > > Nice find, Steph! Here is a relevant snip from the paper: .... "As mentioned, information about an instance with primitive identifier id can be found at /id. Thus, the simplest solution for minting a Linked Data URI for the instance is to append a fragment to the URI. The common conventions of using fragments #this and #me were considered, but in the end, the empty fragment # was chosen so as to require the least amount of modification to the URI possible." .... But more importantly, the question here is not about deciding which one is > best, but whether we should pick one or instead leave it open so that > people can implement whichever approach they prefer, and simply rely on the > nature of HTTP. > > Steph. >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 21:23:57 UTC