W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webid@w3.org > November 2012

Re: New WebID spec on identity.

From: Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:19:40 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFG79eg0bcWMpzaJ=iYBVLjmQZCUf72rXdaenA8UVPYa=tuOkg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu>
Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Olivier Berger <
olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu> wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > You're going back on what we've agreed on in the last teleconf. The
> > consensus was that all NEW WebIDs MUST contain the hash, but verifiers
> > should not fault on hashless ones. It's been marked in red as an issue,
> but
> > it's difficult to spot at this point (no HTML markup when looking at the
> hg
> > raw file).
> >
>
> Just for the records, wasn't last teleconf an informal one ?
>
> So... what was discussed there may not be taken as a general concensus
> of the members, right ?
>

Yes, but the people who were present at that point agreed on what was
discussed then. I don't see this being an issue since the only people
*still* opposing the two main changes (# URIs and 303 redirects) were
present at that time.


> Just checking, in case I misunderstood...
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Olivier BERGER
> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
> Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
> Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)
>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 21:20:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:05:45 UTC