- From: Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 16:19:40 -0500
- To: Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 21:20:27 UTC
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Olivier Berger < olivier.berger@it-sudparis.eu> wrote: > Hi. > > Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> writes: > > > You're going back on what we've agreed on in the last teleconf. The > > consensus was that all NEW WebIDs MUST contain the hash, but verifiers > > should not fault on hashless ones. It's been marked in red as an issue, > but > > it's difficult to spot at this point (no HTML markup when looking at the > hg > > raw file). > > > > Just for the records, wasn't last teleconf an informal one ? > > So... what was discussed there may not be taken as a general concensus > of the members, right ? > Yes, but the people who were present at that point agreed on what was discussed then. I don't see this being an issue since the only people *still* opposing the two main changes (# URIs and 303 redirects) were present at that time. > Just checking, in case I misunderstood... > > Best regards, > -- > Olivier BERGER > http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8 > Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF > Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France) >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 21:20:27 UTC