- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:38:42 +0100
- To: Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 16:39:14 UTC
On 19 November 2012 15:04, Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > I've started drafting the new WebID spec, which deals exclusively with > identity. It should reflect what we discussed at the last teleconf. You can > see the latest draft version here: > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html > > I'm not even sure how to call it at this point, since WebIDentity Identity > spec just doesn't sound right. Maybe we should call it the "WebID spec", > and refer to the old one as WebID-TLS. > > Please let me know if/what comments you may have, so I can make the > necessary adjustments. > +1 I very much like this separation of identity and auth (ie authn and authz) Over the years implementers have asked that apps should have a means by which to contact the user (ie foaf : mbox) at the same time there are cases where you may want to protect the email from spam e.g. this was a use case that plaxo had, and facebook do not have an mbox in the turtle that they serve. So perhaps the *should* is enough here, or maybe it's a case for access control rules. > > Best, > Andrei >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 16:39:14 UTC