- From: Andrei SAMBRA <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:13:13 -0500
- Cc: public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFG79eiNyuGJMoh6WcY3ONoJefHnS7CMjdv+hUgdF8TFMjRaVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Oops, sorry! That wasn't my intention. I'll fix it right away. Andrei On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote: > >> >> On 19 Nov 2012, at 16:57, Niclas Hoyer <niclas@verbugt.de> wrote: >> >> > >> >> Hello all, >> >> >> >> I've started drafting the new WebID spec, which deals exclusively with >> >> identity. It should reflect what we discussed at the last teleconf. You >> >> can see the latest draft version here: >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/WebID/raw-file/tip/spec/identity-respec.html >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm sorry that I could not track all the group activities in the last >> weeks due to the lack of time. The new spec is titled "WebID 1.1". Is the >> WebID Authentication Protocol obsolete now or will that be specified in a >> separate specification? >> >> No, I think this should be number 1.0 just as the WebID over TLS spec >> should be 1.0 >> > > yes, given that 1.0 was never published as a stable Rec, it doesn't make > sense to work on 1.1 yet :) > > Steph. > > >> >> Henry >> >> > >> > Regards, >> > Niclas >> > >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> >> > > > -- > Steph. >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 16:14:02 UTC