Re: Certificate Expiry (summary)

On 1/26/12 12:08 PM, Joe Presbrey wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I caught up with Henry in a quick chat earlier about this and will let
> you know a quick summary. Of course we all agree on extending the
> trust network via URIs, resolving, issues and signers, cosigners,
> freedom and liberty boxes, server clients, etc. all day long. In
> addition:
>
> 1) we should distinguish old keys from current keys with status,
> issuer, date, and/or other properties of the key in our profiles

Okay, so do we tweak the Cert. Ontology accordingly? Or make an adjunct 
Assurance Ontology?
>
> 2) expired self-signed WebIDs should not "go out with the trash", if a
> hacker finds it, they can pretend they are you unless (1)
>
> 3) we should regard x509 properties in addition to (1) while WebID is
> delivered via x509, but prefer LD mechanisms to be compatible with
> other containers and transports

Yes.

Kingsley

>
> Best,
>
> --
> Joe Presbrey
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Henry Story<henry.story@bblfish.net>  wrote:
>> yes make sense +1 - just add Summary to front of the e-mail subject.
>> I think it would be good if each thread had a little summary.
>>
>> On 26 Jan 2012, at 17:35, Joe Presbrey wrote:
>>
>>> I drafted this summary email, if it looks good to you, do you want to send it?
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen