- From: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:08:01 -0500
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: public-webid Group <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGR+nnEF9e3YwJAGe1+-Z=fwu+8yN_N0bHf==kDYf+sJxc9phw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 11:35 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>wrote: > >> >> On 10 Dec 2012, at 22:07, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >> >> > We have tree definitions now: >> > >> > 1. >> > [[ >> > A WebID is a URI with an http or https scheme, which contains a URI >> fragment identifier (i.e. a #id ) and which uniquely denotes an Agent >> (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). The URI without the fragment >> identifier denotes the WebID Profile page. >> > ]] >> > >> > 2. >> > [[ >> > A WebID is a URI with an HTTP or HTTPS scheme which uniquely denotes an >> Agent (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). This URI should include >> a fragment identifier (a string after a "#" character). >> > ]] >> > >> > 3. >> > [[ >> > A WebID is a URI with an HTTP or HTTPS scheme which uniquely denotes an >> Agent (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). >> > ]] >> > >> > Here are a few remarks >> > >> > • Definition 1 does not contain a MUST. Do people want that there. (I >> think Alex Bertails did.) >> > • Def 2 and 3 do not say anything about the document. I think they >> should - as it is this relation of the URI to the document that is >> important important. I suggest it say: >> > "Dereferencing the WebID URI returns the profile document." >> >> On further consideration I updated the wiki with the following clauses >> for SHOULD and MUST, in order to use the same vocabulary of "denotation" as >> in the first definition. >> >> "For WebIDs with fragment identifiers the URI without the fragment >> denotes the document. For WebIDs without fragment identifiers an HTTP >> request on the WebID MUST return a 303 with a Location header URI denoting >> the Profile Document." >> >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash2 >> >> in order to use the same "denotation" language. >> >> If this is ok with everyone, I'd like to ask Stephane to update the spec >> branches that he has for >> the SHOULD and the MUST clauses. >> > > I'll wait another 24 hours in case someone has any remark regarding the > changes above. will make the changes tomorrow if I don't hear anything in > the meantime. > done. The links in the wiki point to the up to date respective versions of the spec: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash2 Steph.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 00:15:57 UTC