- From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:07:50 +0100
- To: public-webid Group <public-webid@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <38E29A13-6D50-4408-B7E0-673A661CCA1E@bblfish.net>
We have tree definitions now: 1. [[ A WebID is a URI with an http or https scheme, which contains a URI fragment identifier (i.e. a #id ) and which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). The URI without the fragment identifier denotes the WebID Profile page. ]] 2. [[ A WebID is a URI with an HTTP or HTTPS scheme which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). This URI should include a fragment identifier (a string after a "#" character). ]] 3. [[ A WebID is a URI with an HTTP or HTTPS scheme which uniquely denotes an Agent (Person, Organization, Group, Device, etc.). ]] Here are a few remarks • Definition 1 does not contain a MUST. Do people want that there. (I think Alex Bertails did.) • Def 2 and 3 do not say anything about the document. I think they should - as it is this relation of the URI to the document that is important important. I suggest it say: "Dereferencing the WebID URI returns the profile document." On 10 Dec 2012, at 19:27, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > > Hi I put together the following questionnaire today using the w3C WBS tool. > It seems like one cannot view it yet, as I set the date for it to be open > for this Saturday after the teleconf. So below is the PDF > > The links to the arguments are pointing to the sections in > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash2 > > Currently the voting allows people to set preferences in their choices, and > to set some preferences. > > Please let me know if you have problems with this. > > <WebID-hash.pdf> > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 21:08:34 UTC