- From: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2012 19:31:36 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: public-webid Group <public-webid@w3.org>
+1 Most important for me is efficiency/caching problem argument, because I already had problems with PHP and JavaScript applications. Am 08.12.2012 17:35, schrieb Henry Story: > As mentioned earlier, I put up a new page of arguments for the Hash > URI discussion we had previously here: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash2 > > I removed all the arguments that had been seriously criticised > (including a lot I put up myself in section 1 ), and also > the sections Against - which made reading this confrontational. > Those arguments tended just to be the inverses of the positive arguments. > > If you feel that there is an argument missing please, contact me > with it, so I can see if the argument is not already there, and > add it. Or you can of course bring it up here. > > Of course if you find that none of your key arguments are > missing you are welcome +1 here. > > Henry > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ >
Received on Saturday, 8 December 2012 18:32:00 UTC