- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 15:22:33 +0100
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Cc: Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com>, nathan@webr3.org, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhJZzeZN5PoU7_f0wCiHPfFugjq8YfdKRz6axy7Dv-65rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 8 December 2012 12:49, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: > The old hash wiki page was too complex for a vote, with too much tit for > tat, > and a lot of repetition. > > So instead I put up a new hash wiki page > > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash2 > > which contains only the arguments in favour of a position, and only the > ones people > have argued for strongest here. This is I know a subjective take on this, > but this is what > I had in mind as something to link to from the spec perhaps, or to use for > the voting. > > Is this reasonable? Perhaps with a few more changes? > Thanks for putting this together Henry. All three definitions seem to me an improvement from the previous, which tied a WebID to a public key. > > Henry > > On 7 Dec 2012, at 22:35, Stéphane Corlosquet <scorlosquet@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote: > >> All, >> >> I'd like to propose that we pick the socially awkward issues of WebID and >> set a time limit on them. A time limit of the end of the year. >> >> A 2 hour meeting / skype / google hangout should be easily enough to >> resolve things and get consensus. >> >> We need to go in to 2013 with all of this behind us, and a clean >> productive slate ahead of us to really polish, implement, utilize and >> promote both WebID and WebID Protocol. >> > > On top of that, at the end of this time limit, I'd like to suggest a WBS > poll open for a week or so. Here is why: the problem we've had with the > Friday telecons is that only a subset of the group is able to make it and > that's the only place we've taken any kind of vote. > > Having a more flexible channel to accept votes would give a chance to the > less vocal people to also take part in the decision of the group. I'm > thinking about Alex, timbl, trueg, Nathan, Olivier Berger, Jonathan Dray, > Sergio Fernandez, many more. I'm not sure if this group can make use of the > W3 WBS system, but that's something Henry can enquire about with Coralie > maybe. > > Steph. > > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > >
Received on Saturday, 8 December 2012 14:23:03 UTC