RE: WebFonts F2F details and proposed agenda - Tuesday, Sep. 3, 2019

There are other options available, like a nice Teppanyaki Hamayu place (https://goo.gl/maps/XXPFDdjHMLQHqVPE8), and, surprisingly, the highest rated of them all is the Thai place "Prince And Princess" (https://goo.gl/maps/Gbgo5PEkd61ShbDa6).


-----Original Message-----
From: Levantovsky, Vladimir 
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 3:35 PM
To: Ken Lunde <lunde@adobe.com>
Cc: w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org) <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Subject: RE: WebFonts F2F details and proposed agenda - Tuesday, Sep. 3, 2019

This looks like a really good lunch option, the description says "modern fast-food joint with Hawaiian flair". I am not sure if it is also a good dinner choice, my knowledge of Japanese is limited by Google translator :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Lunde [mailto:lunde@adobe.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 3:25 PM
To: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
Cc: w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org) <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Subject: Re: WebFonts F2F details and proposed agenda - Tuesday, Sep. 3, 2019

KUA`AINA → https://www.kua-aina.com/shop/77.html


> On Aug 28, 2019, at 12:21 PM, Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
>  
> I need your input for the last topic of the agenda – the WG dinner!
> Looking at the available choices of restaurants nearby – we seem to have many good choices of a traditional variety: Oshima Odaiba (sushi restaurant), Garuva (looks like a Korean BBQ place), Gonpachi (Izakaya restaurant [serving meat and other stuff on skewers]), Sizzler (self-proclaimed “Japanized western restaurant” [buffet style, all you can eat]), and some other choices – all within an easy walk from the venue. I am sure many other fine places are available if we venture out into big city.
>  
> To make an informed decision – please share you preferences (culinary, location, etc.) Also, let me know if you plan to join the WG dinner or have some other plans for the evening.
>  
> Thank you,
> Vlad
>  
>  
> From: Levantovsky, Vladimir [mailto:Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2019 3:25 PM
> To: w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org) 
> <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: WebFonts F2F details and proposed agenda - Tuesday, Sep. 3,
> 2019
>  
> Hello WG,
>  
> In preparation for our face-to-face meeting next week, I’d like to share the following information for your review:
>  
> Date and time: September 3rd, 2019, 9 AM – 5 PM Japan local time
> (UTC: Sep. 3, 00:00 – 08:00; US Pacific: Sep. 2, 5 PM – 1 AM next day; 
> US Eastern: Sep. 2, 8 PM – 4 AM)
>  
> Location
> Miraikan National Museum of Emerging Science and Innovation,
> 2-3-6 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan (Tel.: +81-3-3570-9151) 
> https://www.miraikan.jst.go.jp/en/guide/route/

> Room TBD – hosted by ATypI
>  
> Attendance
> The following WG members have confirmed their F2F attendance:
> Vladimir Levantovsky, Roderick Sheeter, Ken Lunde, Jason Pamental, Garret Rieger, Chris Lilley, Myles Maxfield, Ned Holbrook.
>  
> Teleconferencing: IRC and Zoom meeting facilities will be available for the duration of the meeting.
>  
> Proposed agenda:
> 1.       Introductions / Administrivia (15 min)
> - Charter review: timeline, deliverables [0];
> - Review open action items [1];
> - Future WG telcon scheduling;
> 2.       PFE Evaluation Report topics (~ 1 hour)
> - Summary of work done to date: 
>    Analysis of existing solutions [2, 3];
>    Font data analysis:  [4-7] (also see original email items, 
> unfortunately web archive doesn’t preserve inline images);
> - Discussion of the proposed PFE approaches: binary patch-based, byte-range, hybrid (including modified hybrid approach) [2, 8-10]
> 3.       Planning / future work items (~ 2 hours)
> - Performance analysis framework of proposed PFE approaches [11] (~ 30 min):
>    Languages / technologies for framework to use;
>    Repo location
> - Simulation Planning (including implementation steps / timeline / contributors ~ 1 hour):
>    Patch-based subset font loading (including hybrid approach variants);
>    Patch & subset protocol design [12];
>    HTTP range request font loading (font preprocessor and loading simulation) [8];
>    Unicode-range font loading simulation;
> - Input data set / Font corpus (< 30 min):
>    Ways to acquire input data / page view data set;
>    Font contributions
> 
> (Lunch break ~ 1 hour)
> 
> 4.       Additional items for discussion (~ 1 hour 30 min)::
> - Variable fonts and PFE;
> - Value of PFE for simple & complex scripts;
> - Harfbuzz subsetter;
> 5.       AOB
> 6.       Dinner (TBD)
>  
> Your input and additional topic suggestions are very much appreciated!
> Many thanks to Garret who contributed his proposed agenda items.
>  
> Thank you,
> Vlad
>  
>  
> References:
> [0] WebFonts WG charter: 
> https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/webfonts-2018.html

> [1] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open

> [2] Existing solutions notes (Google): 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AQ2VwiVwF77H2h_nuDHR1A5hRyGlpyIQYp

> YodMtEz1w/edit [3] Existing solutions notes (Adobe): 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kGH8tsoujDqaHD4GTAwHr_AXocUjdJ5umw

> 8fwRKa9TY/edit [4]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Feb/0011.h

> tml [5]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Feb/0012.h

> tml [6]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Aug/0000.h

> tml [7]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Aug/0003.h

> tml [8] http://www.w3.org/2019/04/Maxfield-Streamable-Fonts.key

> [9]
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2019Aug/0023.h

> tml [10] https://www.w3.org/2019/08/19-webfonts-minutes.html

> [11]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kx62tpy5hGIbHh6tHMAryon9Sgye--W_Is

> HTeCMlmEo/edit [12]
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DJ6VkUEZS2kvYZemIoX4fjCgqFXAtlRjpM

> lkOvblSts/edit

Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2019 19:41:55 UTC