- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 16:34:34 -0400
- To: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com>
- Cc: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 10 July 2017 20:34:43 UTC
On 7/10/17 6:42 AM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > I still think WOFF2 should require that order of fonts in a collection > be retained. It still does require it. It just removed the note about this being related to fragment identifiers. > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org > <mailto:chris@w3.org>> wrote: > > WOFF2 has the following note: > > <div class="note" id="collection_head_note"> > <p>Retention of the font order in a font collection is > required for CSS fragment identifiers to ever work.</p> > </div> > > This used to be true, but since fragment identifiers for > collections now use the PostScript name instead of an integer, it > is no longer true. > > Accordingly, I removed that note. > > -- > Chris Lilley > @svgeesus > Technical Director @ W3C > W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design > W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media > > > -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director @ W3C W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
Received on Monday, 10 July 2017 20:34:43 UTC