Re: Order in a collection

And is is, if I’m reading <https://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/#collection_dir_format> right:

A decoder, when processing a font collection, MUST recreate the same order of the nested fonts as they were in the input collection.

> On Jul 10, 2017, at 3:42 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com> wrote:
> 
> I still think WOFF2 should require that order of fonts in a collection be retained.
> 
> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org <mailto:chris@w3.org>> wrote:
> WOFF2 has the following note:
> 
> <div class="note" id="collection_head_note">
>       <p>Retention of the font order in a font collection is required for CSS fragment identifiers to ever work.</p>
>     </div>
> 
> This used to be true, but since fragment identifiers for collections now use the PostScript name instead of an integer, it is no longer true.
> 
> Accordingly, I removed that note.
> 
> -- 
> Chris Lilley
> @svgeesus
> Technical Director @ W3C
> W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design
> W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
> 
> 
>