- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 17:32:43 -0400
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
On 7/7/17 5:08 PM, John Hudson wrote: > On 07/07/17 13:02, Chris Lilley wrote: >> This used to be true, but since fragment identifiers for collections >> now use the PostScript name instead of an integer, it is no longer true. > > > Is that true for both TT and CFF font collections? Yes. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8081#section-4.2 > What about WOFF2 fonts made from older TTCs? > The contents of the WOFF2 are independent of the URL fragment (and the URL mechanism in general). I don't understand the issue. What am I missing? -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director @ W3C W3C Strategy Team, Core Web Design W3C Architecture & Technology Team, Core Web & Media
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 21:32:52 UTC