- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 15:36:10 +0000
- To: Roderick Sheeter <rsheeter@google.com>, WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2017 15:36:44 UTC
Hi Rod, The issues that triggered action 205 were discussed at our May 10 WG telcon (http://www.w3.org/2017/05/10-webfonts-minutes.html), and are also related to what Khaled mentioned earlier in his email response to one of the previous call topic: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2017Mar/0019.html Cheers, Vlad From: Roderick Sheeter [mailto:rsheeter@google.com] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2017 12:48 PM To: WebFonts WG Subject: Fix "the two" decoder issues https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/205 doesn't seem to specify what "the two" decoder issues are. So I fixed two decoder issues :D (https://github.com/google/woff2/pull/81). However, I see a couple more that I suspect we want fixes for before advancing spec state: https://github.com/google/woff2/issues/53 Reject loca with mismatching origLength https://github.com/google/woff2/issues/54 Reject empty glyph with bounding box https://github.com/google/woff2/issues/55 Reject transformed hmtx table with reserved flags bits set
Received on Tuesday, 1 August 2017 15:36:44 UTC