- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:41:16 +0300
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
On 2016-08-11 16:46, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > I am inclined to use the font fragment identifier approach in CTS, as already defined in CSS. Yes, I realize it's not currently implemented by any browser but if it's been kicked around long enough and there seem to be an agreement in CSS WG to use numerical fragment identifiers for font collections. I feel like an attempt to redefine it may result in many more years of delayed implementation support, where supporting fragment identifiers by number may be just around the corner. That is also a very real concern. At the same time, I would rather it was discussed (which may well result in a conclusion to keep the numeric identifiers, or indeed to allow both forms). The CTS should use the numeric identifiers meanwhile, because that is what is currently specified. -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2016 18:41:23 UTC