- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 21:38:02 +0300
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org
On 2016-08-11 03:19, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Hi Ken, > > That's interesting; but then the client needs to inspect the name > table of all faces before resolving the request. I don't believe so. A url with a fragment identifier is resolved by stripping off the fragment, sending the resulting fragment-less url to the server, and resolving the fragment once the resource is returned. So yes, it would need to look in the name table, but that table will be available. > Also, currently name table is unused in webfonts. Agreed, it currently is. The name used in the CSS for a font is unrelated to the name in the font (by design, partly to allow creation of compound fonts using @font-face. That was requested by Donald Knuth by the way). -- Chris Lilley @svgeesus Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2016 18:38:08 UTC