Re: Confusing wording in 4.2. Collection directory format

Associated glyf+loca should fly together. That is, you would share neither
or both but not just one.

...I suppose that explanation may not be any clearer..

On Fri, 5 Jun 2015 13:23 Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> In WOFF2 section 4
>
> > Sharing of glyf and loca tables is allowed and encouraged (this is
> > one of the major benefits of a font collection); however, it is
> > possible that font collections may have two or more pairs of the
> > glyf / loca tables that may not be shared.
>
> Is that "two or more pairs"? Or "two or more unshared tables" (i.e one
> pair)?
>
> I'm just trying to parse out the second clause of the sentence - there
> are a lot of "may" in there. Is it saying "may have a pair that is not
> shared"?  If so, perhaps:
>
> >> that font collections may have one or more pairs of glyf / loca
> >> tables that are not shared.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>  Chris  Lilley
>  Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
>
>
>