Minutes, 14 Jan 2015 Webfonts WG call

Hello WebFonts,

We had a brief call today but closed early due to not having much to
report in terms of closed actions.

Minutes such as they are, at
http://www.w3.org/2015/01/14-webfonts-minutes.html

and below as text.

                 WebFonts Working Group Teleconference

14 Jan 2015

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2015/01/14-webfonts-irc

Attendees

   Present
          [Google], Vlad, ChrisL, jfkthame

   Regrets
   Chair
          Vlad

   Scribe
          ChrisL

Contents

     * [3]Topics
     * [4]Summary of Action Items
     __________________________________________________________

   <trackbot> Date: 14 January 2015

   <RSheeter> kuettel sends regrets, has an overlapping meeting.

   <RSheeter> Chris, we'd like Zakim to have more emotional
   intelligence

   hi all

   zakim will die in 6 months actually

   <RSheeter> aw

   <RSheeter> replacement coming?

   yes but not as good

   team will be testing a cisco sytem

   [5]http://www.leonardpzakimbunkerhillbridge.org/

      [5] http://www.leonardpzakimbunkerhillbridge.org/

   <RSheeter> what a name!

   famous everywhere within 10 miles of Boston

   <RSheeter> I don't hear anything; are you just not talking or
   did everyone drop?

   we are talking

   <Vlad> Rod, can you hear us?

   <Vlad> I wasn't typing :)

   <Vlad> Okay, let's adjourn. We can discuss some issues over
   email, I did sent one about action 157

   so its the whole encoder marc is writing, not just the brotli
   part?

   <RSheeter> a brotli decoder from spec alone

   ok cool

   of course we need tests for the ttc part :)

   <RSheeter> Request: please review the test suites one more time

   did people see firefox 35 shipped with woff2 this week

   <RSheeter> FF35 has it behind a flag I think?

   <jfkthame> right, it's not enabled by default

   [6]http://caniuse.com/#feat=woff2

      [6] http://caniuse.com/#feat=woff2

   would off v.4 impact woff2 though?

   <RSheeter> any sense of when it would come on by default? - the
   ticket about that had no target last I saw

   <jfkthame> i'm hoping that will move forward during Q1/2015,
   but waiting for input from our security team as to whether we
   want to do additional testing/review first

   <jfkthame> ChrisL, i don't think i understand your question?

   (adjourned due to lack of quorum and few completed actions)

Summary of Action Items

   [End of minutes]

-- 
Best regards,
 Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain

Received on Wednesday, 14 January 2015 21:26:36 UTC