Re: Decoder tests

Hi,

I understand this. My question is regarding duplicating the font files;
for Autoring Tool, Format and Decoder tests we provide a ZIP files with
all the test fonts, so what I’m asking is that should I duplicate the
Format files in this Decoder test or just refer to them without
duplication?

Regards,
Khaled

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 02:55:12PM +0000, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> Hi Khaled,
> 
> This particular test should be run using all WOFF2 format files as an
> input (i.e., all those that are properly formatted and would not be
> rejected by the decoder). Once the decoder processed the input WOFF2
> files, the output OFF font files should be captured and run through
> the OFF font validator to confirm that they are valid properly
> structured.
> 
> Thank you,
> Vlad
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Khaled Hosny [mailto:khaledhosny@eglug.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2015 11:39 AM
> To: WebFonts WG
> Subject: Re: Decoder tests
> 
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 10:38:51PM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> > I’m starting to work on Decoder tests, but it is a bit unclear to me 
> > how they are supposed to be handled? Should they be handled like AT 
> > tests, i.e. just providing the WOFF files that should be run through 
> > the decoder? And may be also the input SFNT files for round trip tests?
> 
> The tests are almost done, but I have another question.
> 
> In the mustProduceOFF test [1], should a copy of the file format files in the decoder tests, or just added a test case that is simply the note in the test plan?
> 
> Regards,
> Khaled
> 
> 1. https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Decoder#mustProduceOFF
>

Received on Thursday, 13 August 2015 21:33:16 UTC