RE: Small spec updates (was: Telcon agenda for Wed. April 15)

Thank you Chris,

I also checked in my working copy of the updated version of the spec with all typo fixes reported to date and other minor editorial changes.
( All changes merged, no conflicts. :)

Vlad



-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 2:02 PM
To: Levantovsky, Vladimir; w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)
Subject: Small spec updates (was: Telcon agenda for Wed. April 15)

Hello Vlad,

Tuesday, April 14, 2015, 10:13:22 PM, you wrote:
> - Continue the discussion and finalize the conformance requirements 
> [2];
>  
> - Updates to the CTS plan document [3-5];

> [3]  https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent
> [4]  https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format
> [5]  https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool

I made a small update to the spec as follows:

- restore the conformance stylesheet
- correct IDs of two conformance statements, which were missing
  the conform- prefix

Those two conformance statements were also missing form the UA test plan, so I added them. One is testable, one not (because it is a SHOULD).

I checked (grep) that all the rest of the ids on conformance statements have the conform- prefix. They do.

I'm working through the rest of the UA test plan now.


--
Best regards,
 Chris  Lilley
 Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 18:28:25 UTC