- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:02:13 +0200
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>, "w3c-webfonts-wg (public-webfonts-wg@w3.org)" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello Vlad, Tuesday, April 14, 2015, 10:13:22 PM, you wrote: > - Continue the discussion and finalize the conformance requirements [2]; > > - Updates to the CTS plan document [3-5]; > [3] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-UserAgent > [4] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-Format > [5] https://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/wiki/TestPlan20-AuthoringTool I made a small update to the spec as follows: - restore the conformance stylesheet - correct IDs of two conformance statements, which were missing the conform- prefix Those two conformance statements were also missing form the UA test plan, so I added them. One is testable, one not (because it is a SHOULD). I checked (grep) that all the rest of the ids on conformance statements have the conform- prefix. They do. I'm working through the rest of the UA test plan now. -- Best regards, Chris Lilley Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2015 18:02:23 UTC