- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:49:16 +0200
- To: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello WebFonts,
Minutes at
http://www.w3.org/2014/10/08-webfonts-minutes.html
and as text for trackbot
WebFonts Working Group Teleconference
08 Oct 2014
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2014/10/08-webfonts-irc
Attendees
Present
jfkthame, Vlad, [Microsoft], ChrisL, rod, kuettel_
Regrets
Chair
vlad
Scribe
ChrisL
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]open and pending actions
2. [5]open actions
3. [6]reviewing spec changes
4. [7]test plan
5. [8]tpac meeting
* [9]Summary of Action Items
__________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 08 October 2014
<scribe> scribenick: ChrisL
Vlad: attached new spec to agenda
... we can continue editing test plans
open and pending actions
action-143?
<trackbot> action-143 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Update the
spec in regards to the bug -- due 2014-09-17 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [10]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/143
[10] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/143
Vlad: decided to change name of table to transform glyph table
with explicit definition
... also noticed some things about LOCA calculation, changed
toa nrmative requirement
... in section 5.1
... also some minor changes on bounding box, ref impl was not
same as spec, stream size plyus length of bbox, see email
... so let us keep it like the Google implementation
... not pretty but ok
action-144?
<trackbot> action-144 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Add langauge
to the WOFF2 spec to define how checksum of the 'head' table
should be treated -- due 2014-09-19 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [11]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/144
[11] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/144
Vlad: added explicit UA reqmt to update checksums
... now normative statements, need testing
action-147?
<trackbot> action-147 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Update spec
for bbox dropping criteria, min max of all coordinates -- due
2014-09-23 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/147
[12] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/147
Vlad: added one para in 5.1 second para after table
... detailed description of calc bbox and conditions when to
omit it or keep it
... and explicit for composite glyph
action-151?
<trackbot> action-151 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Change first
paragraph of section 3 to remove reference to private data
compression -- due 2014-09-23 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> [13]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/151
[13] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/151
Vlad: removed indication about compressing. its opaque binary
data
jfkthame: needs a bit more clarification on the table itself
... the semantic portion on various streams. its a sequence of
uint16 not a single uint16
... and how many entries they have
Vlad: depends on actual glyph records
jfkthame: sizes in bytes, needs to be explicit, size in words
or bytes
Vlad: ok
[14]http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/ now updated in cvs
[14] http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF2/spec/
Vlad: better if we drop the additional description as stream
defined later
jfkthame: ok, redundantr but still say size in bytes
Vlad: any other comments
jfkthame: no but not carfefully read through it yet
close action-143
<trackbot> Closed action-143.
close action-144
<trackbot> Closed action-144.
close action-147
<trackbot> Closed action-147.
close action-150
<trackbot> Closed action-150.
close action-151
<trackbot> Closed action-151.
action vlad to review and update description field of transform
glyph table
<trackbot> Created ACTION-152 - Review and update description
field of transform glyph table [on Vladimir Levantovsky - due
2014-10-15].
open actions
[15]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open
[15] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open
action-133?
<trackbot> action-133 -- Raph Levien to Review the spec edits
and finalize the definition of the "nominal size" -- due
2014-10-15 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [16]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/133
[16] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/133
Vlad: hope to hear from Raph on this
... david could you ping him on that?
action-145?
<trackbot> action-145 -- Roderick Sheeter to check padding and
alignment in reference implementation -- due 2014-09-21 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [17]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/145
[17] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/145
RSheeter: not yet
action-146?
<trackbot> action-146 -- Chris Lilley to Use ietf-w3c liaison
to get review and guidance for next steps on brotli id -- due
2014-09-23 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [18]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/146
[18] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/146
ChrisL: (summaries emails)
Vlad: is informational rfc enough?
ChrisL: yes
Vlad: david can you ask your compressions folks for a reviewer
kuettel_: ok so wehen the ID is refreshed, suggest reviewers
... also setting up a top level project for brotli as discussed
at f2f
ChrisL: also provide some context on places the spec is used
action-148?
<trackbot> action-148 -- Vladimir Levantovsky to Review and
edit the conformance test for extraneous data -- due 2014-09-23
-- OPEN
<trackbot> [19]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/148
[19] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/148
Vlad: not domne yet
action-149?
<trackbot> action-149 -- Chris Lilley to Check expectations
regarding cts from ietf -- due 2014-09-23 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [20]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149
[20] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/149
ChrisL: not found much, keep open
reviewing spec changes
Vlad: please read changed parts and email comments
... test plans have some mistakes, need to update them
kuettel_: a diff would be useful
ChrisL: will look for one and send it out
test plan
Vlad: can do this on the phone but hard without spec changes
reviewed
... better to do this in email
tpac meeting
Vlad: several of us are there anyway so lets have an informal
meeting
... can we do a call for consensus in email?
ChrisL: yes
Vlad: wednesday will be busy. maybe on tuesday or thursday
... tues pm is ac meeting
ChrisL: tues better than thurs for me
Vlad: hoperaph can attend, tuesday morning/
kuettel_: yes
sergeym: if anyone is going to unicode but not tpac, thursday
is better
... john hudson may be going
Vlad: currently tuesday seems better
kuettel_: can set up a hangout, and also space at google
offices
... what about time, 8am to 10am
jfkthame: do send out a time but don't be sure i can join
... no preferred time
... depends on what else is happening
Vlad: how about 9am?
kuettel_: earlier means we finish earlier
Vlad: ok, 8am start. please see if raph is available and if 8am
is ok for him
... 2 hours is enough
trackbot, end telcon
Summary of Action Items
[End of minutes]
--
Best regards,
Chris Lilley, Technical Director, W3C Interaction Domain
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2014 20:49:23 UTC