Telcon minutes, Wed., Feb 12

Folks,

We decided to postpone the discussion on the subject of TTC support until next week when we hopefully will have more data and more participants joining. The minutes of the call are available online at http://www.w3.org/2014/02/12-webfonts-minutes.html
and as plain text below.

Thank you,
Vlad


                               - DRAFT -

                 WebFonts Working Group Teleconference

12 Feb 2014

   See also: [2]IRC log

      [2] http://www.w3.org/2014/02/12-webfonts-irc

Attendees

   Present
          +1.650.214.aaaa, Vlad, AWK, jfkthame, JonhHudson, cslye,
          +1.212.381.aabb

   Regrets
   Chair
          SV_MEETING_CHAIR

   Scribe
          kuettel

Contents

     * [3]Topics
     * [4]Summary of Action Items
     __________________________________________________________

   <trackbot> Date: 12 February 2014

   <Vlad> scribenick: kuettel

   Vlad: starting the meeting

   <Vlad> [5]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open

      [5] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/open

   Vlad: gauging possibility of discussing the TTC analysis in the
   meeting today

   Chris: reaching out internally, to gather feedback (regarding
   TTC) and then share with the group

   Fil: just joined to give a quick Brotli patent update

   Jonathan: no strong opinions yet on TTC support in WOFF 2.0

   Vlad: Monotype is not currently serving any TTCs

   Jonathan, Chris: seeing the same thing, esp. as browsers do not
   support TTC yet

   Vlad: let's target discussing this (TTC) in the next meeting as
   more people are able to join
   ... Brotli patent statement update?

   Fil: We are following the pattern set by SPDY, where specific
   patents were not listed
   ... hoping to talk directly with Chris, to understand the
   concerns
   ... believe we are following the common practice, but eager to
   learn more

   Vlad: perhaps reach out to Chris again, to continue the
   discussion

   Fil: will do (with possibly a quick conference call)

   Vlad: any updates on the Brotli IETF RFC?

   Fil: wanted to clarify the patent issues with Chris first
   (prior to the RFC)

   Vlad: was hoping to spend the majority of the time discussing
   TTC, but will need to target next meeting
   ... thus, anything else to discuss?

   John H: discuss top-level media type for fonts?

   Vlad: next step is definitely a clear and concise explanation
   for why it is needed

   David: definitely an overdue action item for me, but was eager
   to gather some hard data first

   Vlad: application should be straightforward, just need a solid
   overview (on why needed)
   ... Christopher, as you learn more on the TTC front, could you
   share with the working group?

   Christopher: yes, will do (time permitting)

Summary of Action Items

   [End of minutes]