- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 18:12:15 +0100
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- CC: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello Vladimir, Tuesday, November 5, 2013, 10:20:43 PM, you wrote: > We will have our regularly scheduled telcon tomorrow My regrets for this evening's call. I'm getting ready to travel to China tomorrow. I'm also further behind on the report than I would have liked, in consequence (but will have some time on the flight to get more done). > Agenda: > > - Review open action items > (http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/) I closed off three actions of mine that were done, and in the past. > - Updates on the current activities (including recent ISO activities) > > - Quick summary of WG findings and future plans (for W3C TPAC meeting next week) > > - Idea up for discussion: Sampo and I had a quick chat > about WOFF 2.0 activities and he came up with an idea on one > additional optimization item for TTF glyph data – the outline > points. In many cases the outline points are defined so that the > on-curve point between two off-curve points can be easily calculated > as a middle point of the line segment that connects off-curve point. > The on-curve points are needed to be explicitly defined for hints, > but when optimizing font data for compression those that are > trivially located and can be restored easily can be dropped (and > restored later after decompression). What do you guys think – should we try and evaluate this? It is probably worth evaluating; it should be done with significant input from font designers so they are comfortable that the visual integrity is not compromised. -- Best regards, Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 6 November 2013 17:12:12 UTC