- From: David Kuettel <kuettel@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 10:18:33 -0700
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>
- Cc: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAYUqgGkrRgw+YYKz7Qo4WfSe8=F8UrbhJE4n9GSRnoK3_O_aw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir < Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote: > Hello David, and welcome to the WebFonts WG! > Thank you Vlad! > **** > > ** ** > > Thank you very much for posting the status update for WOFF 2.0 project. It > is great to hear that you’ve made significant progress on the issues that > were flagged as possible concerns at the last WG meeting (LZMA and > reference decoder implementation). Now that the LZMA compression has been > implemented in Java it alleviates the concern of having implementation from > only a single source, and the work of the Google Chrome team on integrating > the WOFF 2.0 decoder will sure make it easier to enable end-to-end > validation of prototype WOFF 2.0 solution. > We still have a lot of work ahead of us, but Raph, the team and I are very excited to see the project advance. > **** > > ** ** > > All, as you know our first deliverable [1] is the WOFF 2.0 evaluation > report that should make it easier to make a final decision on WOFF 2.0 > compression feature set / implementation and the decisions w.r.t. WOFF 2.0 > recommendation work. I would like to ask you all to review the updated > candidate WOFF 2.0 implementation and discuss it on the WG list. > We will target the evaluation report next. The early versions will likely be quite rough, in the interest of getting feedback sooner rather than later. > **** > > ** ** > > I would also like to resume our regularly scheduled conference calls – > please let me know if you are available for the call this week on > Wednesday, Apr. 3rd ( I believe the regularly scheduled time slot will be > 7 am Pacific / 10 am Eastern / 16:00 CET). > Yes, this Wednesday @ 7AM PDT is perfect. Thank you! > **** > > ** ** > > Thank you,**** > > Vladimir**** > > ** ** > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/06/WebFonts/charter-2012.html**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *From:* David Kuettel [mailto:kuettel@google.com] > *Sent:* Friday, March 29, 2013 8:31 PM > *To:* public-webfonts-wg@w3.org > *Subject:* Quick WOFF 2.0 update**** > > ** ** > > Hello fellow web font working group members,**** > > ** ** > > Recently Raph passed the torch to me to aid in the effort of advancing the > WOFF 2.0 specification. I am honored to have the opportunity to work > closely will all of you to advance the specification and to see Raph’s > creation reach the finish line -- which would be a tremendous win for web > fonts and the web. As I am new to the standardization process (my day job > is running the Google Web Fonts service), please bear with me. :)**** > > ** ** > > A few quick updates, with more to follow in time:**** > > ** ** > > All of the Early Access fonts are now being served with the candidate WOFF > 2.0 enabled (see the .css link for each):**** > > http://www.google.com/fonts/earlyaccess**** > > * * > > The reference WOFF 2.0 font compression tool has been updated and is now > even easier to run. The hard-coded dependency on /usr/bin/lzma had been > removed via use of the SevenZip Java LZMA compression library. The tool is > now pure Java with no external binary dependencies:**** > > http://code.google.com/p/font-compression-reference**** > > ** ** > > Further, we have joined forces with the Chrome team and we are working > together to enable end-to-end validation of the WOFF 2.0 prototype (both > support in Google Web Fonts and Chrome) sometime in the near future.**** > > * * > > Stay tuned!**** > > > David**** >
Received on Monday, 1 April 2013 17:19:21 UTC