- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:38:56 +0100
- To: WebFonts WG <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Hello WebFonts WG,
Minutes at http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html
and below as text
WebFonts Working Group Teleconference
04 Jan 2012
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2012Jan/0003.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-irc
Attendees
Present
+1.781.970.aaaa, ChrisL, +44.845.397.aabb, Vlad, jfkthame,
+1.408.536.aacc, cslye, +1.443.895.aadd, tal
Regrets
Chair
Vlad
Scribe
Chris
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Happy New Year
2. [6]WOFF spec edits
3. [7]Actions
* [8]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<trackbot> Date: 04 January 2012
<scribe> Scribe: Chris
<scribe> ScribeNick: ChrisL
Hello Vlad, Happy New Year
<Vlad> Happy New Year!
Happy New Year
Vlad: kicking off the new year withsome housekeeping
WOFF spec edits
Vlad: jfkthame just emailed with somenew edits- not reviewed them
yet
<cslye> Is everyone getting a lot of noise on the phone, or is that
just me?
jfkthame: removed the stuff about SOR now coveredby CSS3 Fonts
action-107?
<trackbot> ACTION-107 -- Jonathan Kew to - WOFF spec edit, remove
SOR and CORS identified as features at risk -- due 2011-11-23 --
OPEN
<trackbot> [9]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/107
[9] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/107
Vlad: have the edits to CSS3 Fonts een moved to a bublished WD?
jfkthame: assume that is the plan
... we should update sotd
... not CR any more. and some edits relative to CR
ChrisL: willupdate
Vlad: (asks about publishing an updateed CR)
jfkthame: edited status to say its not the CR anymore
... also removed the CORS feature at risk
close action-107
<trackbot> ACTION-107 - WOFF spec edit, remove SOR and CORS
identified as features at risk closed
Vlad: action-108?
action-108?
<trackbot> ACTION-108 -- Jonathan Kew to - WOFF spec edit, update
normative reference section -- due 2011-11-23 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [10]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/108
[10] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/108
jfkthame: also did that
close action-108
<trackbot> ACTION-108 - WOFF spec edit, update normative reference
section closed
Actions
action-103?
<trackbot> ACTION-103 -- Chris Lilley to fix metadata* results for
free passes -- due 2011-09-20 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [11]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/103
[11] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/103
ChrisL: in progress, needs root access to the test suite server
action-104?
<trackbot> ACTION-104 -- Chris Lilley to check on unicorn
integration of the woff validator -- due 2011-09-20 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/104
[12] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/104
ChrisL: is that on myself or Tal?
Vlad: discussed in Rejkjavik
tal: chris was going to checkfor more documentation as the existig
stuff is overmy head
ChrisL: should I set up a 1:1call with the Unicorn folks?
tal: yes please
<scribe> ACTION:chris to set up a unicorn call for tal [recorded in
[13]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: chris to set up a unicorn call for tal [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-109 - Set up a unicorn call for tal [on
Chris Lilley - due 2012-01-11].
action-106?
<trackbot> ACTION-106 -- Chris Lilley to run authoring tools against
the at-tests and make report -- due 2011-09-20 -- OPEN
<trackbot> [15]http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/106
[15] http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/106
<scribe> done - see
[16]http://w3c-test.org/framework/results/woff-at/
[16] http://w3c-test.org/framework/results/woff-at/
ChrisL: sfnt2woff fails on one.
jfkthame: have fixed code but not packaged it - want to re-run tests
to check for regressions
ChrisL: fontforge fails all tests becauzse of a checksum error
jfkthame: pointer to bug report?
ChrisL: will post after the call
jfkthame: would be interwsted to take a look
ChrisL: tal can we share the emailwhere you looked into this?
tal: (checks)
... ok
ua results [17]http://w3c-test.org/framework/results/woff-ua/
[17] http://w3c-test.org/framework/results/woff-ua/
ChrisL: all browsers fail the overlap tests and the extraneous data
tests
... ought to be fixed,may be a security issue
jfkthame: nota serious error butshould be fixed
Vlad: there were also some metadata processing errors - can those be
fixed as well?
jfkthame: unlikely to fix as the firefox addon is just a proof of
concept and it does not enforce the schema.
... no validation
ChrisL: we need two implementations for displaying metadata
Vlad: its an optional feature
... not displaying is a pass but partial display is a fail
ChrisL: maybe a chrome addon for a second one. or an ie addon using
xsd. or add checking using xpath or selectors
jfkthame: or something that uses a browser code to make a command
line processor that reads the metadata and makes an html page -
command line or whatever
... could use whatever python or perl could do that - but I'm not an
xml wizard
Tal: could add this to the validator
... would only display if valid
ChrisL: is there a relaxng for python?
Tal: nope. But the woff validator already does this! so this is
doable
... would this count?
ChrisL: yes
<scribe> ACTION: tal to add woff metadata display to woff validator
[recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-110 - Add woff metadata display to woff
validator [on Tal Leming - due 2012-01-11].
ChrisL: who in each browser deals with this code?
jfkthame: we now use the google otf decoder so thatis where the bugs
are
Vlad: who is doing that?
jfkthame: adam langley I think
... several other commiters to that code
Vlad: so fixing that would hit several
ChrisL: firefox and dafari and chrome
jfkthame: depends on timeline for updates
tal: looking at otf changeog it looks very active
jfkthame: also we would submit patches
... may be able to write the patches
tal: so they do gsub and gpos now ...
jfkthame: yes and we have that code
[19]http://w3c-test.org/framework/details/woff-ua/directory-overlaps
-003/engine/presto/
[19] http://w3c-test.org/framework/details/woff-ua/directory-overlaps-003/engine/presto/
[20]http://w3c-test.org/framework/details/woff-ua/blocks-extraneous-
data-005/engine/gecko/
[20] http://w3c-test.org/framework/details/woff-ua/blocks-extraneous-data-005/engine/gecko/
ChrisL: these are errors, pressed wrong button on the form
... I assume trident uses their own code
... would be good if they could fix that
Vlad: will ask Google if they plan to fix this soon, willsee them
next week
Topic; next meeting
ChrisL: I'm travelling next week, in Australia
Vlad: wil lbe at CS
... cancel next week
... play by ear for next call
adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: chris to set up a unicorn call for tal [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: chris to set up a unicorn call for tal [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: tal to add woff metadata display to woff validator
[recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2012/01/04-webfonts-minutes.html#action03]
[End of minutes]
--
Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain
W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 4 January 2012 21:39:22 UTC