- From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 10:51:44 +0100
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Cc: "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org Group" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On 25 May 2011, at 21:46, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > Hello WG, > > I made one more pass through the metadata portion of the spec to make sure that the two documents (prose and RNG) match. I did find the differences that I think need to be addressed in RNG: > - vendor element: ‘name’ attribute is required in the spec / RNG has it as optional; > - credit element: ‘role’ attribute is optional in the spec / required in RNG (?); > - description element: ‘text’ element is optional / required in RNG (?); Actually, 'text' is required in the 'description' element according to the written spec, because all elements that use 'text' to provide localization, "at least one text child element MUST be present" (see the discussion of the localizable elements, before the element-by-element list). > - licensee element: ‘name’ attribute is required, ‘dir’ and ‘class’ are optional / all three are required in RNG (?); > > Comments? > > Thank you, > Vlad >
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 09:52:17 UTC