- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 17:17:12 +0200
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- CC: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org Group" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Wednesday, June 1, 2011, 4:15:47 PM, Vladimir wrote: LV> On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 5:52 AM Jonathan Kew wrote: >> On 25 May 2011, at 21:46, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: >> > >> > - description element: 'text' element is optional / required >> in RNG (?); >> Actually, 'text' is required in the 'description' element according to >> the written spec, because all elements that use 'text' to provide >> localization, "at least one text child element MUST be present" (see >> the discussion of the localizable elements, before the element-by- >> element list). LV> I gave it one more look, I guess what confuses me is that the LV> "text" element is treated differently in different parts of RNG LV> (although the spec prose says the same thing for all cases). RNG LV> has it sometimes as "oneOrMore", "zeroOrMore" or as plain required LV> element with no qualifier at all. Should it all be the same "oneOrMore" in all cases? I had a look and yes, 'description' had it as a plain required element. I changed it to oneOrMore. For 'license', though, it is indeed zeroOrMore because of our resolution to Issue 18 license element text subelements http://dev.w3.org/webfonts/WOFF/DoC/issues-lc-2010.html#issue-18 in other words we decided that text was optional, because sometimes people want to only link to a license and not summarize or duplicate it as text. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 15:21:30 UTC