- From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 03:24:45 -0400
- To: suzuki toshiya <mpsuzuki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp>
- Cc: "\"Martin J." Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, robert@ocallahan.org, jonathan@jfkew.plus.com, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font@w3.org
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 15:15 +0900, suzuki toshiya wrote: [...] > "writing XML document for the system without XML parser, or human" > is slightly confusing task, but, I think WOFF is primarily designed > for web technology, not for pure XML, so the extra restriction > from non-XML issue would be acceptable. It is perfectly acceptable for some specific XML-based format to say they will only use UTF-8. It would not be acceptable to say, "in our application we accept any XML vocabulary, but only in UTF-8" because that would damage interoperability. But saying "our particulay format must always be in utf-8" is not hurting interoperability, and is OK. Hope this helps. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 07:25:36 UTC