- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:50:14 -0500
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: WOFF Working Group <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:51:05 UTC
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:44 PM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: > > Opera have had plenty of opportunity to make a formal objection to SOR in > the WOFF specification. We're at last call for comments and they have not > done so. HÃ¥kon made no objection at the face-to-face in Lyon. Maybe someone > at Opera thinks they can do an end run by producing an implementation that > ignores this MUST clause, but I think they're just going to end up being > non-conformant. Maybe they'd listen to one of their own customers who wants > to protect an investment in a font asset? What's wrong with protecting one's assets by instructing the server to only serve certain Referrer's? People have been doing that for images for ages. behdad > > JH >
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2011 17:51:05 UTC