- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 22:57:14 +0000
- To: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
- CC: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>, Vladimir Levantovsky <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>, Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan Kew [mailto:jfkthame@googlemail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 3:24 PM > I think this misses the point, in that it does not indicate the > associations between credit, role, and crediturl properties. Given the final proposal which does *not* change the proposed schema, I'm not sure why this matters ?
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 22:57:51 UTC