- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 12:22:03 +0200
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Cc: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Also sprach John Daggett:
> I think defining conformant tool behavior based on the embedding bits
> of the source OpenType font, new or old, will be a much bigger
> distraction than it's worth. Defining the exact meaning of these bits
> has always been problematic and it may not be universal
Indeed. I suggest that the WOFF spec does not say anything about
embedding bits.
Also, remember that user agents come in different flavors. Browsers
don't embed font data in the output (AFAIK), but tools like Prince
(which supports WOFF in the newly released 7.1 [1]) do. So, I don't
think WOFF should say that embedding bits must be honored or ignored
-- that should be left to the UA.
[1] http://www.princexml.com/releases/
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 10:22:53 UTC