- From: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 20:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
- To: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
I think defining conformant tool behavior based on the embedding bits of the source OpenType font, new or old, will be a much bigger distraction than it's worth. Defining the exact meaning of these bits has always been problematic and it may not be universal; a font vendor may be fine having a trusted service do the WOFF conversion but not a general user. A WOFF conversion tool may be part of a larger application, a content management system or a font editor. What should conformant behavior be for something like a font editor? Suggesting in the spec that tools issue a warning based on embedding bits is fine (e.g. restricted embedding) but I don't think *requiring* tools not to produce a WOFF font based on these bits is a good idea. Regards, John Daggett
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2010 03:33:25 UTC