- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:06:17 -0700
- To: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- CC: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>, public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Thomas Phinney wrote: > That would be my expectation as well. I apologize for losing track of > the scope (WOFF tools vs general user agents), but I think it would be > equally problematic to not be able to process existing fonts into > WOFF. Yes. I think we agree that no solution should either prevent creation of WOFF files from existing fonts *or imply that such creation is explicitly permitted*. The situation for existing fonts is necessarily ambiguous and must be referred to the EULA. > However, the OS/2 version bump is one solution. Yes. It will enable makers of new desktop format fonts who wish to technically restrict their use as WOFF fonts to do so. JH
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:07:01 UTC