- From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 12:00:49 -0700
- To: Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com>
- Cc: public-webfonts-wg@w3.org, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Dave Crossland <dave@lab6.com> wrote: > On 11 May 2010 20:17, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: >> Thomas Phinney wrote: >> >>> I would expect the browser >>> folks to object strenuously to this if that was the expectation. >> >> There is no expectation at all on UA agents. The proposed text re. embedding >> bits is that UA's will ignore them completely. The question regards tools >> for creating WOFF files. > > Why will WOFF tool folks not object strenuously to this? That would be my expectation as well. I apologize for losing track of the scope (WOFF tools vs general user agents), but I think it would be equally problematic to not be able to process existing fonts into WOFF. However, the OS/2 version bump is one solution. T -- "I've discovered the worst place to wander while arguing on a hands-free headset." — http://xkcd.com/736/
Received on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 19:01:23 UTC