- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 19:16:46 +0200
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- CC: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, <www-font@w3.org>, 3668 FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On Tuesday, June 8, 2010, 6:57:45 PM, John wrote: JH> Erik van Blokland wrote: >> The only failing use cases are for things that you suggested to add. >> Dropping the meta data will greatly reduce the support the proposal has >> at the foundries and it would move the discussion back a year. I'm not >> sure that's a good way to go. JH> Standard metadata is definitely one of the key selling points of WOFF JH> for font makers and at least some of our customers. Uncertainty over the JH> structure of metadata *extension* shouldn't have any impact on normative JH> definition or acceptance of what I'll call core metadata. It would be good to have some examples of such standard metadata, preferably derived from real-world usage. The spec is short on examples here and good examples encourage people to copy and modify to suit their purposes. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 9 June 2010 17:16:52 UTC