- From: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 19:58:32 +0000
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>, WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On 8 Dec 2010, at 19:39, Chris Lilley wrote: > On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 8:17:09 PM, Tal wrote: > > TL> On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Chris Lilley wrote: > >>> TL> Please let me know if you have comments, concerns, etc. > >>> It may be wise to mention in the tests that the font is being loaded over a network. > > TL> That's a good point. I made the change. Does the phrasing sound okay? > > Yes, it looks great. > > I ran through the tests in Firefox, passes many and fails some due to not throwing out bad WOFF as per spec. Easy though for the implementation to do these checks and pass more, i suspect. > > I also ran them through PrinceXML 7.1 and found an odd effect. Its doesn't display FAIL and it doesn't display PASS. It displays P > > PDF sample (PrinceXML is an xhtml+css to PDF converter) and warning log attached. Looks like PrinceXML isn't loading either the test font or the reference (was it installed? does Prince somehow need to be made aware of it?), and is just using the current/default font there. JK
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 19:59:14 UTC