- From: Levantovsky, Vladimir <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 14:55:14 -0500
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- CC: WOFF Working Group FONT <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
It seems that this is a result of two consecutive failures - it fails to load WOFF file and fails to load the fallback font. Do we know if Prince supports CFF fonts? Vlad > -----Original Message----- > From: public-webfonts-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webfonts-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Chris Lilley > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 2:39 PM > To: Tal Leming > Cc: WOFF Working Group FONT > Subject: Re: Test Suite in CVS > > On Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 8:17:09 PM, Tal wrote: > > TL> On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Chris Lilley wrote: > > >> TL> Please let me know if you have comments, concerns, etc. > > >> It may be wise to mention in the tests that the font is being loaded > over a network. > > TL> That's a good point. I made the change. Does the phrasing sound > okay? > > Yes, it looks great. > > I ran through the tests in Firefox, passes many and fails some due to > not throwing out bad WOFF as per spec. Easy though for the > implementation to do these checks and pass more, i suspect. > > I also ran them through PrinceXML 7.1 and found an odd effect. Its > doesn't display FAIL and it doesn't display PASS. It displays P > > PDF sample (PrinceXML is an xhtml+css to PDF converter) and warning log > attached. > > > > -- > Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain > W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C > Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 19:55:46 UTC