- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 22:53:49 +0000
- To: Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>
- CC: WOFF Working Group <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
This is what WEFT does; in no way is it required to generate a valid EOT file that IE will load. The simplest EOT is just a binary header prefixed to the beginning of a TTF. At some point in time those were referred to as 'EOT-Lite'. > -----Original Message----- > From: Christopher Slye [mailto:cslye@adobe.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 2:24 PM > To: Sylvain Galineau > Cc: WOFF Working Group > Subject: Re: Open Font License FAQ updated! > > Well, isn't it true that most real-world cases of EOT (i.e. WEFT- > produced) result in some subsetting? Seems to me that EOT can be > lossless, but often isn't -- whereas WOFF is necessarily lossless. > > -C
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 22:54:33 UTC