I support this as well. On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com> wrote: > I support this. > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > >> Since the Touch Events v1 Implementation Report [IR] indicates we have >> two or more implementations that pass all of the tests and the comments >> from the 24-Jan-2013 Last Call WD [LC] resulted in no substantive changes >> to the spec (see [LC-comments]), this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to >> publish a Proposed Recommendation of the TEv1 spec, using the latest ED as >> the basis: >> >> <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/**webevents/raw-file/v1/**touchevents.html<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html> >> > >> >> If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this >> e-mail by March 6 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and >> encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. >> >> -Thanks, AB >> >> [IR] <http://www.w3.org/2010/**webevents/wiki/TEv1ImplReport<http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TEv1ImplReport> >> > >> [LC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-**touch-events-20130124/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-touch-events-20130124/> >> > >> [LC-Comments] <http://www.w3.org/2010/**webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-** >> LCWD-24-Jan-2013<http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-24-Jan-2013> >> > >> >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 14:52:15 UTC