- From: Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:40:35 -0400
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: "public-webevents@w3.org" <public-webevents@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 14:41:27 UTC
I support this. On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>wrote: > Since the Touch Events v1 Implementation Report [IR] indicates we have two > or more implementations that pass all of the tests and the comments from > the 24-Jan-2013 Last Call WD [LC] resulted in no substantive changes to the > spec (see [LC-comments]), this is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a > Proposed Recommendation of the TEv1 spec, using the latest ED as the basis: > > <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/**webevents/raw-file/v1/**touchevents.html<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webevents/raw-file/v1/touchevents.html> > > > > If you have any comments or concerns about this CfC, please reply to this > e-mail by March 6 at the latest. Positive response is preferred and > encouraged, and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. > > -Thanks, AB > > [IR] <http://www.w3.org/2010/**webevents/wiki/TEv1ImplReport<http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TEv1ImplReport> > > > [LC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-**touch-events-20130124/<http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-touch-events-20130124/> > > > [LC-Comments] <http://www.w3.org/2010/**webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-** > LCWD-24-Jan-2013<http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-24-Jan-2013> > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 April 2013 14:41:27 UTC