W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webevents@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: Request for Review: single-touch tests; deadline Sept 24

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 14:59:07 -0400
Message-ID: <506F2DFB.70505@nokia.com>
To: ext Rick Byers <rbyers@google.com>
CC: public-webevents@w3.org
On 10/1/12 9:28 PM, ext Rick Byers wrote:
> With the following two changes, and Art's guidance that these tests 
> should focus on testing the spec, not interoperability between 
> implementations, I'm now happy with the state of single-touch.html
> On the multiple test results for the same problem issue, how about a 
> simple pragmatic trade-off: collapse all failures about 
> identifiedTouch into one.  This addresses my main use case (wanting to 
> be able to glance at the failures and make sure they're all 
> understood) without adding much complexity.  I've committed a proposed 
> change for that here: 
> https://github.com/AFBarstow/WebEvents/commit/eef7fbdb9e08bc5c901d0678d2f7ae35b35f7071. 
>  Seem OK?

Your two changes look OK to me so I copied the latest file on GH to Hg 
and put it in a new dir called Moz-Nok-Goog since it has contributions 
from Matt, Rick and Art:


I would appreciate it folks would please run this version and report 

On my Nokia N9 I got 233 Passes and 3 Fails:

* 2 are Expected: "document.createTouchList exists and correctly creates 
a TouchList from a single Touch" ; Actual: "assert_equals: 
touchList.length is 1, expected 1 bug 0" ;

* 1 Expected: "TouchList contans an identifiedTouch property" ; Actual: 
"assert_true: expected tru got false" ; [I think this is a browser bug 
that was reported earlier]

Re multi-touch testing, next week I hope to take a deep dive but if 
someone can beat me to it, that would be very much appreciated!

-Thanks, Art

> And for the screenX/Y failures on mobile devices: given the above and 
> the complexity of the various scale factors applied in different 
> scenarios (browser zoom, vs. device scale, etc), I don't think it's 
> worth trying to validate these values.  I've removed them: 
> https://github.com/AFBarstow/WebEvents/commit/86d50fc931a97f408234e937c4d45d3fbb03ff6d
> Rick
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 18:59:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:03:55 UTC